Comments on: Thoughts on Earth One

By: Darren

Darren — Sun, 13 Dec 2009 11:27:59 +0000

I’m quite excited by the idea – but I agree, two books a year needs to be clarified. If it’s only two books ayear for the entire line, it’s going to take forever to get off the ground. I do see these being used to tie into the movie franchises though (sort of getting their ducks in a row). Wouldn’t be surprised to see a Green Lantern one ready towards the end of next year.
.-= Darren’s latest blog post: Daredevil by Frank Miller Omnibus Companion =-.

By: Lee H

Lee H — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 23:15:31 +0000

Every comic could be somebody’s first, so it’s important to re-tell the origins quite frequently. The great thing about Superman, Batman, Flash and the like though is that their origins can be summed up in less than one page. Then plenty of time to tell a NEW STORY.

I don’t see why it’s necessary to create yet another “universe” to tell the stories in though. Why not just tell a regular Superman or Batman story that simply doesn’t reference any of the confusing stuff? Is the status quo of the DC Universe really such a mess that they can’t tell a Batman vs Riddler story any more?

I mean, it kind of is, but only because they write it that way. DC just needs to learn to Keep It Simple.

(On a less relevant note, wow, I really don’t like those designs for Batman and Alfred Pennyworth.)

By: kwaku

kwaku — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:29:46 +0000

I think it will be two GNs per character per year. If each GN is roughly the same size as a trade, each artist can do two a year with time to spare. Even someone like Gary Frank who is able to to two big story arcs(5-6 issues) per year.

I hope there more characters getting this treatment.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 22:23:35 +0000

I agree with pretty much each pro and con you’ve listed Kelson. I especially agree with the point that by focusing on the graphic novel format (as opposed to monthly ongoings) they can appeal more to the bookstore crowd. I have been hoping for more OGN’s for a long time as someone who loves the convenience and affordability of them.

I’m not too worried about these new books getting bogged down in their own continuity real fast since they’re only putting out two OGN’s a year. Hopefully the next two after this will feature other characters (maybe a Flash one eventually) and help to introduce them to new audiences. I can however see them all too easily rehashing old story ideas eventually though.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:41:35 +0000

If you want to catch on the vast blue ocean of non-comic-buyers, adding additional continuities strikes me as a myopic solution.

I found out about Ultimates years after the fact, and I felt like it was too late to jump on. Considering its purpose, is that ironic?

I’m busy enough with DC and 616- worrying about Black Nick Fury and how Ultimate Spidey gets through the cloooooooooooooooooone saaaaaaaaaaaaaagaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa is more effort than I’m willing to spend.

I’m willing to bet it won’t be long before Earth-1 joins Ultimate Marvel, 616, and DCU in the mires of impenetrable continuity fog that regular people don’t have time for. Then it becomes just another group of monthly titles going through just enough of the paces to keep the fans on board.

By: Flash Fact

Flash Fact — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:22:18 +0000

Generally, I’m excited for these, but the Batman redesign is just god-awful.

By: ElfGrove

ElfGrove — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:44:18 +0000

I agree with you for the most part. I think this makes DCU accessible to the book store crowd, and I love the Batman redesign. I also agree that two books per year ought to be a per character. Otherwise the delay will be too long to keep an audience. Most US Japanese manga releases are at least every 3~4 months if they sell well, and twice a year if they’re less popular titles. While the time to print is shorter for these, that is the market-style they’ll likely be competing with.

I think everyone is going to be thrown off by the Earth One branding. I wish they’d chosen some other moniker.

In fact I think the only point I disagree on with you is the origin story angles. If we want to pull in a new audience, I think it will help. (Although I’m also concerned about old story rehashing.)
I was watching a movie with a friend a while back and during the previews she accused a movie of being a Heroes rip-off for having normal people that developed physic abilities due to genetic mutation and had to deal with the fallout of a fearful government that also wanted to exploit them. It was a very X-Men concept. I pointed out to her that it was simpler to say they were both copying X-Men. She had no idea X-Men was about mutants. She thought it was just costumed superheroes with varying origin stories. I would have thought the X-Men being genetic evolution/mutation was basic pop-culture knowledge. It isn’t like she dislikes those sorts of stories, but she has no comics background and wouldn’t know Superman’s and Batman’s origin stories any more than she didn’t know that X-Men was about genetic mutations. It will help reach a larger audience than you might think to start at the beginning.
.-= ElfGrove’s latest blog post: HALP. IT IMPRINTED ON ME AGAINST MY WILL. =-.

By: Elasticlad

Elasticlad — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:22:06 +0000

Isn’t this just rebranding the All-Star line? New takes on classic characters?

By: collectededitions

collectededitions — Mon, 07 Dec 2009 19:39:15 +0000

Indeed it is like the Ultimate line for the new new millennium. You saw that I'm not crazy about the origins aspect of this, either, but if it really catches on, ten, twelve volumes down the road, this'll be a fantastic set with the origins at the beginning and then whatever else may come. Plus, when you finally get to the AICN interview, Straczynski's enthusiasm for Superman is fantastic. .-= collectededitions’s latest blog post: DC Announces Earth One Superman and Batman Graphic Novels =-.